From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: timor <timor.dd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should org-get-outline-path strip dedicated targets?
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:11:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAX25XDf5JmQgs5NuiWknVrEmqd5sKvuB1vLYr1kAbyN50FffA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAX25XBTH3fzxQ+hj03aNFmJ2412DY_cG_e32YgbiOS9zxTnxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eg84dtno.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40585)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <timor.dd@gmail.com>) id 1bDUGS-0005Hk-BV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:11:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <timor.dd@gmail.com>) id 1bDUGQ-0005eU-D1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:11:07 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:38600)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <timor.dd@gmail.com>) id 1bDUGQ-0005eQ-6T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:11:06 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m124so61958112wme.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87eg84dtno.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr

Hello Nicolas,

Custom IDs seem to be a good alternative here, although I would think
about the <<target>> part as an invisible part, since I don't expect
it to be visible for e.g. export.

Thanks.

Regards,
timor