From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jacob Gerlach <jacobgerlach@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] Blank line required between text and short caption
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:43:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA6UvuF=EhTt2iasOqN1dTVb7o3BkGGT+ZfYm=aHGDLknFokbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA6UvuEWayueJ=WczXm=uW7cWkqC2zUx9cpMHtNg7sx2XqYpYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vbghs4bm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33734)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jacobgerlach@gmail.com>) id 1Ymtce-0005hn-Sz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:43:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jacobgerlach@gmail.com>) id 1Ymtcd-0005ff-UC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:43:36 -0400
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]:33931)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jacobgerlach@gmail.com>) id 1Ymtcd-0005fQ-Pe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:43:35 -0400
Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so8160799ied.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87vbghs4bm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> No, it is a genuine bug from parser. This should be fixed in
> eb77fed33fa0306ebed2224f7895b688320847b2.
Confirmed that it is fixed. Thank you.

Regards,
Jake