Hi,

thanks for this syntax.
2012/11/10 Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com>


> requirement 1 and 3 would be something like this:
>
>   DEADLINE: <2012-11-11 So ++2w -2d>
>
> , a repeated task with an explicit deadline for the item.
>
> Regarding 2, the setting to DONE automatically bit:
> May I ask, why you consider that? It doesn't seem really
> useful to me; a status change, purely based on time, does not convey any
> information whatsoever afaict.
>
>
In this special issue I have to do a report every two weeks and the agenda
should only remember myself; in case the date passed, it doesn't matter:
 the status should change for a fortnight to DONE

I don't want to have list of items in the agenda, which are always done and
I have to change manually the status.

ukhara