From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Colin Fraizer <orgmode@cfraizer.com>
Subject: Re: question about org-latex-regexps
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:22:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CA4DEFC9-A7F3-495E-94D3-AD59561A57FE@cfraizer.com>
References: <00c101ccf575$d3c20b70$7b462250$@cfraizer.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39203)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <orgmode@cfraizer.com>) id 1S2WNt-0005jp-V9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:23:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <orgmode@cfraizer.com>) id 1S2WNZ-0002dO-PR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:23:05 -0500
Received: from caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5]:52430
	helo=homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <orgmode@cfraizer.com>) id 1S2WNZ-0002cS-Bs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:22:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <00c101ccf575$d3c20b70$7b462250$@cfraizer.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Colin Fraizer <orgmode@cfraizer.com>
Cc: "<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Wow, I think I'm an org pariah. Did my email violate some org cultural norm?=
 :-)

If so, I apologize.

Anyone have strong feelings about whether a change like this is advisable?


On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, "Colin Fraizer" <orgmode@cfraizer.com> wrote:

> The variable org-latex-regexps has an element
>=20
>    ("$" "\\([^$]\\|^\\)\\(\\(\\$\\([^
> \r\n,;.$][^$\n\r]*?\\(\n[^$\n\r]*?\\)\\{0,2\\}[^
> \r\n,.$]\\)\\$\\)\\)\\([-    .,?;:'\")\000]\\|$\\)" 2 nil)
>=20
> The 6th nested subexpression (starts with "\\([-") prevents conversion of
> some latex math-mode stuff.
>=20
> Is there a reason for that subexpression to be so restrictive? Because I
> mostly write UTF-8 org-mode documents, I often have "$<some math>$" follow=
ed
> immediately by an EN DASH or EM DASH (U+2013 or U+2014). Is there a reason=

> why those characters could not be inserted in that character class?
>=20
> That is, could I change that subexpression to be "\\([---
> .,?;:'\")\000]\\|$\\)" ?
>=20
> [I've tried it with a couple of files and didn't notice any problems.
>=20
> Thanks,
> --Colin
>=20
>=20