Okay thanks. If anyone else does know, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! :) On 31 March 2014 14:45, Nick Dokos wrote: > Noah Slater writes: > > > Ah yes, I see that I have to move the point into the table cell. I was > > trying with the table header. Slightly odd that. Means that it only > > works on tables that aggregate clock times across multiple files, > > where the times are put in the same cell. Can you replicate? If you do > > a clocktable with the scope set to that file, then there's no way to > > order the cells. > > > > How hard would it be to modify org-dblock-write do you think? In hours > > work for someone familiar with elisp, but not the org codebase. > > > > No idea - I have never used clocktables. > > > On 31 March 2014 03:06, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > > Noah Slater writes: > > > > > Yeah, tried that. Doesn't work! :( > > > > > > > AFAICT, it works fine on your first stackoverflow example. > > > > There is probably no hope of getting this method to work the way you > > want on your second example though: org-sort does not know anything > > about the substructure of the table. The only way I can think of is > to > > make the dynblock function that produces the table > > (org-dblock-write:clocktable) do the sorting. > > > > > On 30 March 2014 23:24, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > > > > Noah Slater writes: > > > > > > > I posted a question on StackOverflow: > > > > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22749704/how-can-you-sort-an-org-clock-table > > > > > > > > Summary is: how do I sort an clock table by the % column? > > > > > > > > Is there anything "out there" I can use to get this working? > If not, > > > > how complex a job would it be to write something that did > this? > > > > > > > > If you point me in the right direction, I'll see what I can > come up with. > > > > > > > > > > Never tried on a clock table, but the following works on a > generic > > > table, so I assume that it will work on a clock table too: put > point > > > in the column by which you want to sort the table (in the body > of the > > > table, not in the header) and say M-x org-sort RET n (I assume > you > > > want numeric sorting, but org-sort provides several kinds). > org-sort > > > is normally bound to C-c ^ too, so > > > > > > C-c ^ n > > > > > > should be all that's needed. > > > -- > > > Nick > > > > > > > -- > > Nick > > > > -- > Nick > > >