From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustav_Wikstr=F6m?= Subject: [Orgmode] Re: [PATCH] org-display-inline-images to reduce image size Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:45:22 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZOc3-0001SO-RL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:45:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZObt-0004tT-UF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:45:35 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:33204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZObt-0004sx-Nm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:45:25 -0400 Received: by yhr47 with SMTP id 47so2929728yhr.0 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 08:45:22 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List Cc: vladimir@sirma.bg Hi! I was just searching the web for a way to scale inline images and found this thread in the archives.. How did it go with it? Was it tested and not approved or why is it that the patch is not applied? (Patch: http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/526/) Regards Gustav > From: Vladimir Alexiev > Subject: [Orgmode] Re: [PATCH] org-display-inline-images to reduce image size > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:31:17 +0000 (UTC) > User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) > > How to avoid line breakage in the patch? > Some source lines are naturally >80 chars and I wouldn't like to shorten them. > I posted from the web (http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.emacs.orgmode) > I guess I should get an account and post from a real mail client? > > Furthermore, the "Comments" at the patchwork server > (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/526/) > mess up the patch, though the patch itself is ok > (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/526/raw/)