Good afternoon, On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Percival du Chat Gris wrote: > > > Good day, > > > > I've tried googling, reading faqs and the like, and have come up empty. > > > > If I have a number of stub files, with the information in them that I > want to pull into multiple > > documents, and I #+INCLUDE them in a file, I get the latex "too deeply > nested" error. > > Please provide details and, if possible, a minimal example. > Sorry about that, I was hoping, perhaps, it was a known problem, and I was just failing to find the FAQ. > Who produces this error? The LaTeX -> PDF conversion that happens after I do C-c C-e p from the Export.log file [...] LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fvs/bx/n' in size <14.4> not available (Font) Font shape `T1/fvs/b/n' tried instead on input line 68. LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fvs/b/n' will be (Font) scaled to size 12.9599pt on input line 68. \tf@toc=\write4 \openout4 = `Export.toc'. [2] LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fvs/bx/n' in size <12> not available (Font) Font shape `T1/fvs/b/n' tried instead on input line 87. LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fvs/b/n' will be (Font) scaled to size 10.79993pt on input line 87. LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `TS1/fve/m/n' will be (Font) scaled to size 9.85492pt on input line 96. LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fve/bx/n' in size <10.95> not available (Font) Font shape `T1/fve/b/n' tried instead on input line 103. LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fve/b/n' will be (Font) scaled to size 9.85492pt on input line 103. [1] ! LaTeX Error: Too deeply nested. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H for immediate help. ... l.236 \begin{itemize} ? H You're in trouble here. Try typing to proceed. If that doesn't work, type X to quit. ? [2] ! LaTeX Error: Too deeply nested. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H for immediate help. ... l.268 \begin{itemize} ? ! LaTeX Error: Too deeply nested. And that repeats over and over again. > What is the exact output? Unfortunately there isn't any output. > What version of org/emacs? > Org-mode: Version : 7.9.2-1 Emacs: Version : 23.3.a-3 Are you using the new exporter or the old exporter? > How would I be able to tell? > > If the error is produced by latex, export to latex and look at the .tex > file. If the error is produced by org, it > would help to have a backtrace. > Well ... I presume the error is produced by Latex, because I can get the same thing if I run LaTex Export.tex, but if I replace all the #+INCLUDE references with the contents of the files themselves, in the .org file, it works, so I think it's an .org problem, in producing the .tex files, not (necessarily) a LaTex problem. I think (not being an expert) it seems that, with the stub-based file (Export.tex), the single * in each of the #+INCLUDEed files becomes a subsection, as opposed to an actual section (as it did in Export-1.tex), since a section of the diff file between the .tex files produced looks something like: diff Export.tex Export-1.tex [...] 1144a1132,1133 > \subsection{Dynamic Interactions} > \label{sec-7-5} 1146,1147d1134 < \item Dynamic Interactions\\ < \label{sec-1-1-4-5-1-6-5-1-10-5-1-4-5-1-4-5-1-5}% 1154c1141 < \label{sec-1-1-4-5-1-6-5-1-10-5-1-4-5-1-4-5-1-5-1}% --- > \label{sec-7-5-1}% 1157c1144 < \label{sec-1-1-4-5-1-6-5-1-10-5-1-4-5-1-4-5-1-5-2}% --- > \label{sec-7-5-2}% 1160c1147 < \label{sec-1-1-4-5-1-6-5-1-10-5-1-4-5-1-4-5-1-5-3}% --- > \label{sec-7-5-3}% 1163c1150 < \label{sec-1-1-4-5-1-6-5-1-10-5-1-4-5-1-4-5-1-5-4}% --- > \label{sec-7-5-4}% 1166c1153 [...] > I attach a tarball with a simple example where the new exporter with > > Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-432-g545166 @ > /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) > GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.4) of > 2012-09-21 > Thank you, I will try it, and see if that will clear up the issue. > > does the right thing. > > Nick > > > If, however, > > I simply insert the files into the buffer, then they will create the PDF > via latex export without a > > problem. Is there something in the #+INCLUDE code that adds a nested > layer such that it becomes > > problematic for PDF production? If so, is there a better route to > create PDF files? I have been > > using Latex and HTML export for a while, so I'm not entirely familiar > with any other options that > > might produce PDF files as cleanly. While I can (and have) written a > script to pull all the pieces > > together into one large file, there should be an easier way. > > > >