From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Change example timestamps to not occur in headlines Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:53:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLH5M-0001Pk-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:53:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLH5K-0006ip-VH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:53:28 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:49449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLH5K-0006iT-Lk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:53:26 -0400 Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so9234604bkw.0 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Brian van den Broek Cc: emacs-orgmode On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Brian van den Broek wrote: > On 20 April 2012 18:16, John Hendy wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Brian van den Broek >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a >>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in >>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that. >>> >> >> Can you point to the discouragement? I do this and would like to know >> why it's discouraged but didn't see anything noting it in the manual >> section on dates and timestamps. >> >> Thanks, >> John > > > Hi John, > > The first footnote on > , for > instance. There may be more, but this is the one I could find, > quickly. Gotcha. Just my take -- your patch made me think it was a major offense. The man seems to just mention that it can mess up headline linking. Not a big deal and still is a valid point, but wasn't what I expected. Thanks for the link! John > > Best, > > Brian vdB