From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Including multiple plots resulting from a loop of R code in LaTeX Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:40:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wr0p4l0h.fsf@gmx.com> <29539.1346100058@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6735-0007dx-5S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6733-0008Le-TN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:43 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:41095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6733-0008La-Jq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:41 -0400 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so5908355vcb.0 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:40:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29539.1346100058@alphaville> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode , Eric Schulte On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > John Hendy wrote: > >> There are six of these sections, however when I do C-c C-c on the >> block and then C-c C-e p to export to LaTeX, I get duplicate sections >> back to back. I have to delete the entire results section and only do >> C-c C-e p with an empty results section to have the duplicate removed. >> >> Why might this be? >> > > Don't know - but did you try a named source block? If that workd, > i.e. does not give you the duplication of results, then a) you have a > workaround and b) that provides extra information about the (possible) > bug. If it doesn't - ah, well: it was a shot in the dark in the first > place :-) Thanks for the suggestion. I should have included that I did have my block named, so sorry for not including that. I guess it all came down to :results output org in the end. Thanks again, John > > Also, are you sure you don't have anything between the source block and > the results block? > > Nick