On Jan 21, 2015 7:09 AM, "Søren Mikkelsen" <soren@aamikkelsen.dk> wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-20 22:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Søren Mikkelsen <smik@iha.dk> writes:
> >
> >> I'm trying to use the taskjuggler exporter for getting an overview of
my
> >> project, and it seems to be straight forward if you know a bit about
> >> Taskjuggler.
> >>
> >> However, tasks that are scheduled org-mode like, i.e.,
> >>
> >> *** TODO My task
> >>   SCHEDULED: <2015-01-27 Tue>
> >>
> >> don't appear in the report. But, if I add a START property it will
appear.
> >>
> >> *** TODO My task 2
> >>     :PROPERTIES:
> >>     :start:    2015-03-01
> >>     :END:
> >>
> >> I suspect it has something to do with l462-470:
> >>
> >> (defun org-taskjuggler-get-start (item)
> >>   "Return start date for task or resource ITEM.
> >> ITEM is a headline.  Return value is a string or nil if ITEM
> >> doesn't have any start date defined."
> >>   (let ((scheduled (org-element-property :scheduled item)))
> >>     (or
> >>      (and scheduled (org-timestamp-format scheduled "%Y-%02m-%02d"))
> >>      (and (memq 'start org-taskjuggler-valid-task-attributes)
> >>        (org-element-property :START item)))))
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not that experienced in elisp, so I hope someone can help me.
> >
> > There is no bug in the snippet shown.
> >
> >  "ox-taskjuggler" just doesn't use SCHEDULED to set start property for
> > tasks. However, it will use SCHEDULED to set the start date for the
> > project.
> >
> > Note that I don't use Taskjuggler, so I don't know if this is the right
> > behaviour or not.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> According to the org mode docs, assigning the start of a task should be
> possible both ways:
>
> http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/taskjuggler/ox-taskjuggler.html#sec-5
>
> Or am I misinterpreting the docs?
>

Well, I wrote that , so you may be correctly interpreting docs written by
someone who misunderstood!

Perhaps the SCHUDULED property is just for the main project container. I
don't see it actually used in any examples?

Sorry if the confusion was my fault!
John
> --
> Best regards,
> Søren Mikkelsen
>
>