From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Error with :wrap org in babel and 8.0-pre Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87li8ncqzq.fsf@gmail.com> <87li8jfysj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5cjy3du.fsf@gmail.com> <87txn7y2hb.fsf@gmail.com> <874nf7fsix.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj2re7xl.fsf@gmail.com> <87obdfe5mo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49995) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7XL-00028U-NN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:11:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7XJ-0001cm-GG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:11:11 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]:52564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7LR-0003wA-2a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:58:53 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fp13so562226lab.12 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Moe Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , emacs-orgmode , Eric Schulte On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Christian Moe wrote: > > Eric Schulte writes: >>> - Is =:results drawer= what we want as the syntax to get org syntax >>> parsed by the exporter? >> >> Yes. >> >>> Just guessing from the name, it strikes me as a fix or enhancement for >>> some other behavior/option that's now being applied to code as an >>> after thought. >>> >> >> As I recall this solution came about because drawers are the best (maybe >> only) way to demarcate a region without changing its semantics (which is >> exactly what we want in this case). > > I suppose you've considered delimiting results in general with e.g. a > line like #+END_RESULTS? > As in compiling with simply =:results output raw= and then adding my own #+end_results line after the block? If so, I haven't tried that. But :wrap with no second argument creates #+begin/end_results, which doesn't export correctly. Thanks, John > Needless clutter for the most part, I know. But perhaps useful in this > kind of case. Also safe, semantically neutral, and possibly more > intuitive than drawers, with less special behaviors in terms of > visibility and export. > > Yours, > Christian > >