From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Error with :wrap org in babel and 8.0-pre Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:05:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87li8ncqzq.fsf@gmail.com> <87li8jfysj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5cjy3du.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URpey-0008RY-MC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:05:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URpex-000827-DU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:05:52 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:52327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URpew-00081w-UO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:05:51 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p11so4943924lbi.0 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5cjy3du.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode , Eric Schulte On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > John Hendy writes: > >> #+RESULTS: >> #+BEGIN_org >> With the assumption of 100 lbs. of input material 1 and 200 lbs. of material 2, >> we can produce the following number of widgets based on injection mold >> wall thicknesses. >> | wall | vals | widgets | >> |-------+------+----------| >> | 5 mil | 0.01 | 40000.00 | >> | 6 mil | 0.01 | 33333.00 | >> | 8 mil | 0.01 | 25000.00 | >> #+END_org > > This is wrong. We discussed it months ago on this ML and, IIRC, Babel > should produce "#+begin_src org" blocks, not "#+begin_org". Org > documentation specifies it too. > "Wrong," as in =:wrap org= behavior is currently a bug? Or "wrong" in that for my given use case, I shouldn't be using =:wrap org=? > I didn't read the thread carefully, but you may want to use "drawer" > output instead. > In general and permanently moving forward, or as a workaround for the above (taking the first interpretation that =:wrap org= is misbehaving)? Thanks, John > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou