From: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Exporting via babel to LaTeX
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:10:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M2ft-2Y+R7mJOkXJT8hO92=1PXWj-9oC_x50Wez+sQ+XUEzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r4u43sbo.fsf@tsdye.com>
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I've only ever used src blocks to make plots or create files to
>> include. I have my first opportunity to actually try and include both
>> code and results and have a question about spacing. You won't have my
>> data, but this is pretty simple stuff.:
>>
>> #+begin_src R :session basic :results output :exports both
>> nrow(data)
>> #+end_src
>> #+begin_src R :session basic :results output :exports both
>> nrow(nonzero.data)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> I split them up because I wanted the results like so:
>>
>> Code-A
>> Results-A
>> Code-B
>> Results-B
>>
>> If I kept them together, it came out Code-A, Code-B, then Results-A, Results-B.
>>
>> Anyway, the LaTeX output is creating the following:
>>
>> \begin{verbatim}
>> nrow(data)
>> \end{verbatim}
>>
>> \begin{verbatim}
>> [1] 681
>> \end{verbatim}
>>
>> \begin{verbatim}
>> nrow(nonzero.data)
>> \end{verbatim}
>>
>> \begin{verbatim}
>> [1] 455
>> \end{verbatim}
>>
>> This gives really, really spaced out results. I'd prefer output that
>> looks more like an R terminal output, which can be done by not putting
>> code and results in separate verbatim blocks. Is this standard
>> spacing/behavior or is there an option/exporter tweak I can use on
>> this? It just ends up taking so much space.
>>
>> I'm super new to this and barely know anything about the header
>> arguments at all. I will say I was thrilled to find out about the
>> :session option. I was worried about "walking through code" because I
>> rely on initial block results to carry through to the others. What do
>> you know? There's a way to do that :) Thanks for this wonderful
>> implementation. I've seen it come up on the list hundreds of time and
>> have to say it's really cool actually getting to work with it!
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> John
>>
>>
> Hi John,
>
> One way to do this would be to redefine the verbatim environment in
> LaTeX. There is a fancyvrb package for LaTeX that might help with this.
>
> I think a better answer to your query has two parts.
>
> 1) Make Org-mode distinguish your code and results, instead of having
> them both be verbatim environments. One way to do this would be to use
> listings or minted to typeset the source code blocks: see
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html#sec-12.
>
> Then use :wrap foo to wrap the results in a foo environment.
>
> 2) Configure LaTeX to typeset the new environments in a way that pleases
> you. LaTeX specifies for each environment the space to leave before it
> and after it. You should be able to set these so the results please
> you. Here is one example for how to modify the results block:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html#sec-10-2.
> Note that this was written for an earlier version of Org-mode, before
> results blocks were stored in drawers. Instead of "results" use "foo".
>
To follow up on this because it seemed a bit simper..., I added the
example to my file:
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{framed}
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{xcolor}
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{.95}
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \newenvironment{results}{\begin{shaded}}{\end{shaded}}
But it doesn't change anything. Since it says this will affect a
"results block," I [intuitively] tried:
#+begin_results
test
#+end_results
But don't see anything different. Did I mis-interpret how this works?
Or do I need the above /with/ either minted or listing and it's not
standalone?
Thanks,
John
> You'll need to consult the listings or minted packages to configure one
> of them.
>
> In effect, you will be taking advantage of LaTeX's semantic markup.
>
> hth,
> Tom
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-28 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-28 18:48 Exporting via babel to LaTeX John Hendy
2012-05-28 18:56 ` Achim Gratz
2012-05-28 21:32 ` Thomas S. Dye
2012-05-28 23:02 ` John Hendy
2012-05-28 23:35 ` Thomas S. Dye
2012-05-29 2:33 ` John Hendy
2012-05-29 3:29 ` Thomas S. Dye
2012-05-29 3:46 ` John Hendy
2012-05-29 4:53 ` Thomas S. Dye
2012-05-28 23:10 ` John Hendy [this message]
2012-05-28 23:30 ` Thomas S. Dye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+M2ft-2Y+R7mJOkXJT8hO92=1PXWj-9oC_x50Wez+sQ+XUEzA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jw.hendy@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=tsd@tsdye.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).