If the stricter definition covers everything that org-babel-escape-script
was supposed to do... I agree we should keep it.
My problem was I wasn't sure if the function got pruned of something it
needed.

But if that's not the case...

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> wrote:

> Feel free to wait to hear others' thoughts on this, but, in any case,
> please use 'git format-patch' to generate a patch with a commit message
> (see the contributing section of the website [1] for more information).
> Also, it'd be nice to add a test that catches the original error.
>

...here is the git format-patch of the ob-ruby.el change!

I also created one for a test to check for basic Ruby evaluation
capabilities. It should catch errors that break evaluation like this in
ob-ruby. (I find it interesting that the session tests worked without the
double-escape change actually.)