From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Bernoulli Subject: Re: Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:50:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874m1krwk5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877f5xaedv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f91424001770546134313 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSULP-0002E3-SR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:50:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSULP-0005jJ-12 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:50:31 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]:35137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSULO-0005j3-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:50:30 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id j18so67071689ioe.2 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:50:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-Mode mailing list , "Charles C. Berry" --001a113f91424001770546134313 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'll get back to you in a few days. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > > > I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are > part > > of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are > > suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while at > > the same time not get those two extra spaces. (By the way, I don't like > > that work-around.) > > This is not really a work-around. If we want to preserve indentation, as > "-i" implies, we need a fixed point to compute it. Here it is column 0. > > > However for me that's what happened for example blocks only. For source > > blocks I got an additional five spaces, for which I found no explanation. > > (The only indentation in the Org source before the code-block lines are > the > > two part-of-a-list-element spaces.) > > Could you show an ECM? > > Regards, > --001a113f91424001770546134313 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'll get back to you in a few days.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 P= M, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Jonas Bernoulli <jonasbernoulli@gmail.com> write= s:

> I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are= part
> of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are > suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while = at
> the same time not get those two extra spaces. (By the way, I don't= like
> that work-around.)

This is not really a work-around. If we want to preserve indentation= , as
"-i" implies, we need a fixed point to compute it. Here it is col= umn 0.

> However for me that's what happened for example blocks only. For s= ource
> blocks I got an additional five spaces, for which I found no explanati= on.
> (The only indentation in the Org source before the code-block lines ar= e the
> two part-of-a-list-element spaces.)

Could you show an ECM?

Regards,

--001a113f91424001770546134313--