From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Bernoulli Subject: Re: Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874m1krwk5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877f5xaedv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed0da319eda0546155caf Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWgi-0002dd-CQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:20:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWgh-0005op-GS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:20:40 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]:36139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWgh-0005oh-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:20:39 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id j13so68390139iod.3 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:20:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-Mode mailing list , "Charles C. Berry" --001a113ed0da319eda0546155caf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 /s/indention/indentation/ And sorry for the earlier top-posting and generally awful formatting. For some odd reason I subscribed using Gmail, and that is giving me some grieve. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: >> >> >> Could you show an ECM? >> > > I was going to, but: > > Turns out: > 1. Whether -i is used doesn't matter here. > 2. The reason these blocks are not intended the same way is that > SRC => @example or @lisp > EXAMPLE => @verbatim > 3. What bothered me wasn't so much the additional indention, but the > inconsistency. I actually like it better with the extra indentation, and I > also think that this is what we are suppposed to do in Texinfo. So I am > redefining org-texinfo-example-block to use @example instead of @verbatim. > > Best regards, > Jonas > > --001a113ed0da319eda0546155caf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
/s/indention/indentation/

And sorry for= the earlier top-posting and generally awful formatting. For some odd reaso= n I subscribed using Gmail, and that is giving me some grieve.
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">
On Sat, Jan 14, 20= 17 at 11:11 PM, Jonas Bernoulli <jonasbernoulli@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14= , 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

Could you show an ECM?

I = was going to, but:=C2=A0

Turns out:
1. W= hether -i is used doesn't matter here.
2. The reason these bl= ocks are not intended the same way is that
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SRC =3D&g= t; @example or @lisp
=C2=A0 =C2=A0EXAMPLE =3D> @verbatim
=
3. What bothered me wasn't so much the additional indention, but t= he inconsistency. I actually like it better with the extra indentation, and= I also think that this is what we are suppposed to do in Texinfo. So I am = redefining=C2=A0org-texinfo-example-block to use @example instead of @= verbatim.

Best regards,
Jonas
<= /div>

--001a113ed0da319eda0546155caf--