From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: Options for HTML & PDF export Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7020.1305753555@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMoIS-0006rY-N1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:28:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMoIR-0001Qd-J3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:28:48 -0400 Received: from mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com ([163.231.6.26]:45455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMoIR-0001QY-B8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:28:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7020.1305753555@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 5/18/11 4:19 PM, "Nick Dokos" wrote: > wrote: > >> I'm wondering about "best practices" (though I hate that term) for >> managing the export to both HTML & PDF. For the HTML I generate the >> graphics files as PNG, but for PDF the PNG format doesn't embed very >> well,=20 > >What is the problem with PNG exactly? I've never had any problems >incorporating them into a PDF. It is a bitmap format, so it will not >suffer extreme changes in magnification without some ugliness of course, >but other than that I don't know of any problems. That is exactly the problem =3D). It does include itself into the document= , it just doesn't look very nice. Since these are data-based graphics coming from R, their lines should be nice & crisp, but they end up looking pretty fuzzy. -- Ken Williams Senior Research Scientist Thomson Reuters http://labs.thomsonreuters.com