From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Re: New module: org-learn, incremental reading Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:44:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <558B167B-65F3-4E3B-8696-1FF00243177E@gmail.com> <20091021135827.GA817@billpowellisalive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0jvH-0003dE-MV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:44:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0jvD-0003cf-5P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:44:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54263 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0jvC-0003cX-W2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:44:47 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com ([209.85.220.228]:42433) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0jvC-0004Oz-Kv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:44:46 -0400 Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so8453163fxm.42 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:44:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091021135827.GA817@billpowellisalive.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bill Powell Cc: Org-mode Mode On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Bill Powell wrote: > In my own experience, material /always/ has to be repeated. > Especially when you're first learning something, those > "perfect" responses will turn real shaky if you wait three > months before you look at the items again. I believe this is > how Anki and Mnemosyne work, too. The algorithm had two details that maybe we could make configurable: 1. If the user's quality answer is <3, restart the OF-Matrix all over again, but using the current E-Factor. 2. If the user's quality answer is >3, stop the repetition cycle. We could make these numbers be min and max, and configurable, so that you could either always repeat, or only restart the OF-Matrix if it's below a lower number. John