From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Notes and Clock entries Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:23:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eirqnzeo.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdMuA-0001ve-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:31:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdMu6-0001ru-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:31:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34501 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdMu4-0001rc-TO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:64734) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdMu4-0003MV-F2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:31:00 -0400 Received: by mail-fx0-f219.google.com with SMTP id 19so2921811fxm.2 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eirqnzeo.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Noorul Islam K M Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > Hi, > > Please take a look at the below org file. Initially I created the TODO > item and then clocked in and out. Then inserted a note. Followed by > some > clock ins and outs. Everything is organized from top to bottom as we > enter items. Earlier I remember the clock entries were grouped and > always appeared at the top but now it is cluttered. I am using the > latest version from git repo. Is this the expected behavior or am I > missing something by which I can group all the clock entries into a > group at the top or bottom? Also I remember that I was able to hide > entire clock entries. > > ----------------------CUT--------------------------------------- > * Inbox > ** TODO This is a test > CLOCK: [2009-08-05 Wed 18:46] > CLOCK: [2009-08-05 Wed 18:46]--[2009-08-05 Wed 18:46] => 0:00 > CLOCK: [2009-08-05 Wed 18:46]--[2009-08-05 Wed 18:46] => 0:00 > - Note taken on [2009-08-05 Wed 18:46] \\ > Test > CLOCK: [2009-08-05 Wed 18:46]--[2009-08-05 Wed 18:46] => 0:00 > > ----------------------CUT---------------------------------------- Notes and clock entries are supposed to be kept in chronological sequence. So yes, this is the expected behavior. You can define a separate drawer for clock entries, if you prefer so: (setq org-clock-into-drawer "CLOCK") - Carsten