From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: footnote export fails if footnote indented Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:50:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87skabj973.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <0D8AC6D2-35B9-4F0B-A47B-76A6FC28E83D@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O24jN-0003Sc-2c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:42:21 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37777 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O24jK-0003Qv-TD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:42:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O24jI-0002zN-Qg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:42:18 -0400 Received: from paard.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.182]:57016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O24jI-0002xT-Ha for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:42:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0D8AC6D2-35B9-4F0B-A47B-76A6FC28E83D@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Dan Davison , emacs org-mode mailing list Hi Dan, have you given this patch any serious testing, and do you have any remarks about it? Thanks. - Carsten On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Dan Davison wrote: > >> If you hit on a footnote definition, it indents it away from >> column 1, to align with its heading. However, the footnote definition >> needs to start in column 1 in order for the footnote to be correctly >> exported. It would be nice if the footnote exported correctly even >> when >> indented (or if that's problematic, then a less preferable solution >> would be having not indent it). > > Hi Dan, > > here is a patch that allows footnote definitions to be detached from > the left margin. However, I am not sure if it breaks anything else > - so extensive testing would be necessary... > > Also, renumbering footnotes etc will put them back at the margin > currently. I am not sure how that should be handled otherwise.... > > - Carsten > > - Carsten