From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Org-special-blogs does not make well-formed xhtml
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:23:35 +0200
Message-ID: <BC7DC1E0-4705-476D-833E-EC02B6462897@gmail.com>
References: <4E89AE38.3020309@christianmoe.com> <80r52unr44.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57198)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RB363-0005kM-13
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:23:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RB361-0001W7-P6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:23:38 -0400
Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:61444)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RB361-0001Vy-Gn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:23:37 -0400
Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so421075eye.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <80r52unr44.fsf@somewhere.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Oct 3, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:

> Hi Christian Moe,
>=20
> Christian Moe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> XHTML produced with Org-special-blocks is not well-formed; <div> tags=20=

>> get wrapped in <p> tags. Example:
>>=20
>>    Some text.
>>=20
>>    #+begin_sidebar
>>      Some details left out of the main text.
>>=20
>>      Some more details.
>>    #+end_sidebar
>>=20
>>    Some more text.
>>=20
>> This results in the following html, which causes XML processors to =
fail.
>>=20
>>    <p>
>>    <div class=3D"sidebar">
>>      Some details left out of the main text.
>>    </p>
>>    <p>
>>      Some more details.
>>    </div>
>>    </p>
>>    <p>
>>    Some more text.
>>    </p></div>
>>=20
>> The problem seems to be fixed by un-commenting the fifth line in the=20=

>> below function in org-special-blocks.el:
>>=20
>>    (defun org-special-blocks-convert-html-special-cookies ()
>>      "Converts the special cookies into div blocks."
>>      ;; Uses the dynamically-bound variable `line'.
>>      (when (string-match "^ORG-\\(.*\\)-\\(START\\|END\\)$" line)
>>    ;    (org-close-par-maybe)
>>        (message "%s" (match-string 1))
>>        (if (equal (match-string 2 line) "START")
>> 	   (insert "<div class=3D\"" (match-string 1 line) "\">\n")
>> 	 (insert "</div>\n"))
>>        (throw 'nextline nil)))
>>=20
>> Does anyone know if that was commented out for a reason?
>=20
> git blame suggests it was there since that file org-special-blocks.el =
has been
> added (in contrib/lisp, by Carsten, on 2009-05-07 13:53)...
>=20
> Best regards,
>  Seb
>=20
> --=20
> Sebastien Vauban
>=20
>=20

I see no reason to not uncomment this line.  Shall we just do this?



- Carsten