emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Org linting library
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 23:15:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BBCACCD3-C36F-4D22-8DF6-76570DD4D828@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oluiobnhtg4.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>



Envoyé de mon iPhone

> Le 20 mai 2015 à 22:42, Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Rainer,
> 
> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>> 
>>> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Rainer,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>>>>>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The following library implements linting for Org syntax. The sole public
>>>>>>> function is `org-lint', which see.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Internally, the library defines a new structure: `org-lint-checker',
>>>>>>> with the following slots:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  - NAME: Unique check identifier, as a symbol. The check is done
>>>>>>>    calling the function `org-lint-NAME' with one mandatory argument,
>>>>>>>    the parse tree describing the current Org buffer. Such function
>>>>>>>    calls are wrapped within a `save-excursion' and point is always at
>>>>>>>    `point-min'. Its return value has to be an alist (POSITION MESSAGE)
>>>>>>>    when POSITION refer to the buffer position of the error, as an
>>>>>>>    integer, and MESSAGE is a strings describing the error.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  - DESCRIPTION: Summary about the check, as a string.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  - CATEGORIES: Categories relative to the check, as a list of symbol.
>>>>>>>    They are used for filtering when calling `org-lint'. Checkers not
>>>>>>>    explicitly associated to a category are collected in the `default'
>>>>>>>    one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  - TRUST: The trust level one can have in the check. It is either `low'
>>>>>>>    or `high', depending on the heuristics implemented and the nature of
>>>>>>>    the check. This has an indicative value only and is displayed along
>>>>>>>    reports.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All checks have to be listed in `org-lint--checkers'.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Results are displayed in a special "*Org Lint*" buffer with a dedicated
>>>>>>> major mode, derived from `tabulated-list-mode'. In addition to the usual
>>>>>>> key-bindings inherited from it, "C-j" displays problematic line reported
>>>>>>> under point and "RET" jumps to it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Checks currently implemented are:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  - duplicates CUSTOM_ID properties
>>>>>>>  - duplicate NAME values
>>>>>>>  - duplicate targets
>>>>>>>  - duplicate footnote definitions
>>>>>>>  - orphaned affiliated keywords
>>>>>>>  - obsolete affiliated keywords
>>>>>>>  - missing language in src blocks
>>>>>>>  - NAME values with a colon
>>>>>>>  - wrong header arguments in src blocks
>>>>>>>  - misuse of CATEGORY keyword
>>>>>>>  - "coderef" links with unknown destination
>>>>>>>  - "custom-id" links with unknown destination
>>>>>>>  - "fuzzy" links with unknown destination
>>>>>>>  - "id" links with unknown destination
>>>>>>>  - links to non-existent local files
>>>>>>>  - special properties in properties drawer
>>>>>>>  - obsolete syntax for PROPERTIES drawers
>>>>>>>  - missing definition for footnote references
>>>>>>>  - missing reference for footnote definitions
>>>>>>>  - non-footnote definitions in footnote section
>>>>>>>  - probable invalid keywords
>>>>>>>  - invalid blocks
>>>>>>>  - probable incomplete drawers
>>>>>>>  - obsolete QUOTE section
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Since it relies on lexical binding, `pcase' and `string-prefix-p', it
>>>>>>> cannot be added to Org 8.3, but can make it into Org 8.4, if deemed
>>>>>>> useful enough.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This sounds very interesting and I would like to try it out. I
>>>>>> understand that it can't be put into master, but could it be put into a
>>>>>> branch?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This would make testing a bit easier.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is.  The branch is called `wip-lint'.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks (also to Nicolas) - I found it. Just expected the branch to be
>>>> tracked automatically.
>>>> 
>>>> This is really brilliant!
>>>> 
>>>> But I now get a message in one .org file:
>>>> 
>>>> ,----
>>>> | Org linting process starting...
>>>> | Search failed: "^[    ]*#\\+NAME: +tab:sensVar"
>>>> `----
>>>> 
>>>> and no results.
>>>> 
>>>> Works in other .org files.
>>>> 
>>>> This one is rather long (11570 lines) and many code blocks.
>>>> 
>>>> Just let me know how I can trace down where this is coming from and what
>>>> the message tells me.
>>> 
>>> It seems that the error comes from the fact that ~#+LABEL: sensVar~ was
>>> defined twice.
>>> 
>>> Renaming these results in working linting.
>> 
>> OK - please ignore this last comment.
>> 
>> There is an example where I get the error:
>> 
>> * Fitting the kernel to the data
>> The parameter which will be fitted can be found in Table [[tab:fitInitial]]
>> 
>> #+CAPTION: Variables used for the initial fit of the wind profile using the function and the initial values.
>> #+LABEL: tab:fitInitial
>> | variable           | initial value | remark                                           |
>> |--------------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------|
>> 
>> The cause is the link [[tab:initial]] If I remove everything below and
>> including the line #+CAPTION the linting works.
>> 
>> ,----
>> |      2 high  Unknown fuzzy location "tab:fitInitial"
>> `----
> 
> Untested - but should that not be
> #+NAME: tab:fitInitial
> rather than #+LABEL?
> 

Yes - that would be correct. But the linting should tell me that instead of failing with this message 

Cheers,

Rainer

> Cheers,
> Andreas
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-20 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-19 13:31 [RFC] Org linting library Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-19 14:23 ` Rasmus
2015-04-19 16:24   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-19 19:32 ` Marco Wahl
2015-04-20 10:42   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-20  2:15 ` Charles C. Berry
2015-04-20  9:12   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-22 19:27 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-22 19:31   ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-04-22 19:40     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-23 10:47   ` Eric Abrahamsen
2015-04-23 16:25   ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-04-26 12:50     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-27 15:22 ` Doug Lewan
2015-05-19 11:54 ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-19 13:39   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-19 14:54     ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-19 19:09       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-19 20:02         ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-19 21:03           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-19 21:10             ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-19 21:26               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-19 21:35                 ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-19 13:32 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-19 13:43   ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-20 15:01     ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-20 15:08       ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-20 15:24         ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-20 20:42           ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-20 21:15             ` Rainer M Krug [this message]
2015-05-20 21:46           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-21  8:40             ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-21 16:24               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-21 18:18                 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-21 18:23                 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-21 18:30                 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-21 21:53                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-22  8:10                     ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-22 19:08                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-23 12:00                         ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-24 15:19                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-24 15:52                             ` Rainer M Krug
2015-05-27  9:31                               ` Andreas Leha
2015-05-27 10:49                                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-05-19 13:47   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-06-05 10:51 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-06-05 21:40   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-06-06 14:44     ` Rainer M Krug
2015-06-06 23:22       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-06-08  7:50         ` Rainer M Krug
2015-06-09  7:30           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-06-09  7:50             ` Rainer M Krug
2015-06-16 21:54               ` Nicolas Goaziou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BBCACCD3-C36F-4D22-8DF6-76570DD4D828@gmail.com \
    --to=r.m.krug@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).