From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-beamer feaure request : single frame background
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:06:30 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTink3Gz5r33vmF2SDOmzPZQ_qVb=4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <irilui$s3u$1@dough.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41067)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QPGbn-0008Ex-4c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:06:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QPGbj-0001Sx-58
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:06:55 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:51987)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QPGbj-0001SZ-0O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:06:51 -0400
Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so8428433bwz.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 25 May 2011 09:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <irilui$s3u$1@dough.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sander Boer <sanderboer@yahoo.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Sander Boer <sanderboer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> A quick look at org-beamer.el makes me think that there is no infrastructure
> in place that accounts for enclosing each frame in its own tex environment,
> although I think that would be trivial.

You can try (untested):

#+LATEX: { %}

* This is a frame
  The commented out closing brace is important. Otherwise the exporter
gets confused.

#+LATEX: }

The other option might be to write your own function and add it to one
of the export hooks.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.