From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rustom Mody Subject: Re: git useage question Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:20:42 +0530 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd289301e72ea04a4f4c214 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTAur-0000SE-8U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 06:50:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTAup-0007w8-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 06:50:45 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:51662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTAup-0007w1-HU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 06:50:43 -0400 Received: by iyl8 with SMTP id 8so2565218iyl.0 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 03:50:42 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode --000e0cd289301e72ea04a4f4c214 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jude DaShiell wrote: > The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of the simtel archives. Taken down but last I > knew not entirely removed from the internet. Does not seem to match the data here http://git.kernel.org/?p=editors/uemacs/uemacs.git;a=summary Note the dates (and the owner) --000e0cd289301e72ea04a4f4c214 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jude DaShiell wrote:
> The only place microemacs might be by now coul= d be some orphan version of=A0 the simtel archives. =A0Taken down but last = I
> knew not entirely removed from the internet.

Does not seem= to match the data here
http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Deditors/uemacs/uemacs.git;a=3Dsummary
N= ote the dates (and the owner)
--000e0cd289301e72ea04a4f4c214--