From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: A "wouldn't it be cool" feature: statistics report Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:15:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQTb-0002TX-TW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:00:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQTZ-0002RU-18 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:00:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQTY-0002RJ-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:00:00 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImQTY-0007gF-17 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:00:00 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so1949211fkr for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 27Oct2007, at 8:08 AM, John Wiegley wrote: > After three months of using org-mode, I can happily say that there are > now over 500 resolved items in my archive. > > It would very cool if there were an org-statistics command to show me: > > Breakdown of resolution types > Average length of time between entry and completion > Breakdown of resolved tasks by category > etc. > > Not a necessary feature by any means, but it would be flashy.. ;) I guess it would be relatively easy to write a dynamic block for this. The reason why I don't see an easy way yet to integrate it into org core is the same why so far I have refrained from putting in your automatic archiver: Both depend on a particular definition of task/project and how they are recognized. If would not work (for example) for GTD people who make a task active by assigning a context, for example. - Carsten