From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: checkboxes and agenda invisibility Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:35:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090201154424.2c07d9ff@johnrakestraw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTy1s-0005ky-N9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:35:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTy1o-0005km-BZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:35:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43592 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTy1o-0005kj-50 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:35:52 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:17424) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTy1n-0007II-Oq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:35:52 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so284661nfi.26 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:35:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090201154424.2c07d9ff@johnrakestraw.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Rakestraw Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Good point, but non-trivial to implement. I'll put it on the list. - Carsten On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:44 PM, John Rakestraw wrote: > I noticed today that, at least in my set-up, setting these variables > this way: > > (setq org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks 'invisible) > (setq org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t) > > means that a TODO task with checkboxes doesn't get included in the > agenda. However, the sub-tasks in the checkbox list don't get > included, > either. So the TODO task with checkboxes doesn't show up in the > agenda. > > It makes sense given the way the variables work. However, I wonder if > it makes more sense for a task with checklisted sub-tasks to be > included in the agenda so that the tasks and sub-tasks don't get lost. > Or, to put the point slightly differently, I think that a TODO that's > blocked because it has dependent TODOs might be treated differently in > agenda listings than a TODO that's blocked because it has dependent > checklist items. > > Not a big deal to me because I don't typically use checkboxes for TODO > items. But I thought I'd raise it for consideration. > > --John > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode