From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [help] A org agenda command Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:51:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8bbaaec901190cf1570574695f22c1fa@science.uva.nl> <9317ac8ef4b544f84de2011a23d769d8@science.uva.nl> <83d4dyr125.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <3A277BBC-00D9-4F71-BAFC-C588D9C4CC9C@uva.nl> <83wsc6p66r.fsf@cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVM15-0003Yd-U5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:24:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVM14-0003YR-Fu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:24:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53952 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVM14-0003YO-DS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:24:50 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:19356) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVM14-00017l-0m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:24:50 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVM13-0007xd-9A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:24:49 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id b39so16643ugd.17 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:24:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83wsc6p66r.fsf@cam.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Leo, I am afraid there is no "good" solution to this problem, you can always look at this two ways. Would you like to suggest a place where this behavior could be documented? - Carsten On Feb 4, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Leo wrote: > On 2009-02-04 14:22 +0000, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Leo wrote: >>> >>>> On 2007-04-24 11:18 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>>> LEVEL=2/-DONE means that the search for stuck projects should >>>>> consider >>>>> any level 2 entry (i.e. starting with **) as a project, but should >>>>> immediately exclude projects where the top headline is marked >>>>> DONE. >>>> >>>> I remember we had a discussion to make LEVEL=2 respect >>>> `org-odd-levels-only' i.e. LEVEL=2 would mean headings starting >>>> with >>>> three "*" when org-odd-levels-only is t. >>>> >>>> However, after using this for such a long time I realise this is >>>> counter >>>> intuitive. Thus if possible please revert the change. > [...] >> Hi Leo, > > Hi Carsten, long time no 'see'. > >> this is possible, but will break what people use, I am afraid. > > I re-read our discussion. Realising that org-odd-levels-only can be > set > on a per file basis, now I think it is better to keep current > change. The remaining issue is to find a place to document the meaning > of LEVEL in org-stuck-projects. > > Actually I have removed customisation of org-stuck-projects and use > its > default value. With the flowing of so many new features into org, I > find > less need to inspect stuck projects. > >> - Carsten > > Best wishes, > -- > .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.