From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:35:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87tz4fb2rb.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu> <74997EBF-D0EA-49F9-BC19-36535EE6ADC9@gmail.com> <87eiviqud3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87bpqmqrg3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxJhG-0003i8-N2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:35:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxJhB-0003hh-9k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:35:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51005 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxJhB-0003he-44 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:35:53 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.144]:3087) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LxJhA-0005hg-NZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:35:52 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so202378eye.24 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:35:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bpqmqrg3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Does seem faster! Numbers indicate a 2x improvement? Yes. With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to 1.5 seconds. Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the original 4.35 seconds. Please, everybody watch out for strange behavior in the agenda, to make sure I have not messed up anything while doing the optimization. We should to profiling more often, this can apparently make a big difference..... - Carsten