I wonder about the complexity associated with adding an expert mode. My area is design, and one of my pet peeves about all things designed is how they tend to increase in complexity for the sake of extending their scope, without much attention being paid to the brittleness that accumulates collaterally. Since complexity is a non-linear thing, adding even one time element can increase it, and brittleness, significantly. I think - and I would suggest - that it can all be done with documentation. That is, one can lay out doc so that the complex things just aren't staring one in the face. If the doc were properly designed, users just wouldn't know about the 'power' stuff and so wouldn't be prone to getting overwhelmed by it. And this keeps the code itself less complex. I even think this applies to the matter of more compact messaging. Just a thought. Cheers. Fil On 10 March 2011 05:05, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > Org tries to stay as simple/accessible as possible for newbie and as > complete/flexible as possible for power users. > > The documentation and the UI are central for this: the documentation > should promote core features, document complex ones, and give pointers > on how to hack Org -- it does that already IMO; the UI should give > access to core features and give hints on complex ones, so that the > user can learn more. > > I've just added the ability to run a custom function for bulk agenda > actions (thanks to Puneeth for the patch!) This is clearly for power > users -- or those who are willing to take the time to find functions > that we might document in Worg. > > So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when > turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features and > perhaps display more helpful messages on simple ones; when turned on, > Org would have a less verbose UI (think of the C-c C-e window, do we > really want to *read* it all the times?) and give access to all the > complex features. > > This is really just a call for ideas/comments -- I wonder if people > already came accross such an idea and and what they think. > > I'm myself not convinced: it's a good thing that Org doesn't need an > Expert mode so far, it means newbies are not confused by the UI, and > experts are not frustrated by it either. But I expect neat features > can emerge from the discussion. > > Thanks for your thoughts! > > -- > Bastien > > -- Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Ryerson University 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749 Fax: 416/979-5265 Email: salustri@ryerson.ca http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/