From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Neff Subject: Add-hook or org-defkey? Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:32:34 -0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36435 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlPWS-0007lN-8K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlPWO-0007IC-DS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:32:37 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:43637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlPWO-0007HT-6G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:32:36 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so2989251bwz.0 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:34 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode I've seen both of these methods used to define/re-define keys in org-agenda mode: --------------- hook-way ------------------------- (add-hook 'org-agenda-mode-hook '(lambda () (define-key org-agenda-mode-map "w" 'org-agenda-refile) )) --------------- another way ---------------- (org-defkey org-agenda-mode-map "w" 'org-agenda-refile) Is there an advantage to using one way versus the other? Seems like the second way is simpler. Thanks, --Nate