On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Should this be the standard practice now? Images for something in Worg/
> > org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc_*.org should be kept in the same
> directory?
>
> I'd suggest this: images linked to only one file should go in the same
> directory than this file, images useful for several files could go in
> the images/ directory.
>
>
Actually -- sorry... I was just going to change this and wanted to re-ask
what others think. For example, I currently have 7 images of plots in
worg/images/babel/. I titled them gnuplot-imageName.png to try and make them
easy to spot.

Were I to switch to the "new system", would it bother anyone to have a bunch
of image files no in worg/org-contrib/babel/languages? Does anyone else care
if the directory is filled with both org files and images? Or would anyone
prefer a worg/org-contrib/babel/images directory since the supporting files
for babel are growing with all of the documentation being written?

I guess it doesn't matter much to me; I just hesitated before updating as I
wondered what everyone else thought and might have stronger preferences
about directory "clutter" and unity with file types and such.

Thoughts?

John


> > Also, is there a list of the directories that are published and those
> that are
> > not? For example, I also put a downloadable example file here:
>
> The only directory that is skipped at export time is FIXME/.
>
> > I'm just wondering if the Worg instructions on how to contribute should
> include
> > a directory tree of some sort so that the newer contributors like myself
> are on
> > the same page as everyone else?
>
> I hope the recent updates on worg-setup.org can help newcomers find
> their way :)
>
> Don't hesitate to suggest other improvements!
>
> --
>  Bastien
>