From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Horn Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:30:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7cwym9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fwso3gd6.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i0ag08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsowwtd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fwsoaeja.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <8762tks46h.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60761 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfmAT-0002bL-72 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:30:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfmAR-0006Tn-Bz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:30:41 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:40039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfmAR-0006Tc-11 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:30:39 -0500 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so186027fxm.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:30:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8762tks46h.fsf@fastmail.fm> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Achim Gratz , Jason Dunsmore , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: > I believe these pages have not been exported since we turned off the > inline css publishing option; i.e., they have not been touched since > that time, so the publishing mechanism does not export them. Matt, I was going to grep through the repo and "touch" all the files that haven't changed since then. Obviously, that's not really possible since the org files don't contain this CSS. :-) Perhaps Jason could give us a list of the affected files? Something like grep -r 'CDATA' * in the Worg root might do the trick. Also, I was rather doomed to failure anyway. Touching a file doesn't change its contents, so git won't think anything has changed. (I know, it's a "Duh") Maybe once we find the files, we could use a script add a whitespace character to the end of each org file and republish? -- Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/