From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: feng shu Subject: Re: Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:33:07 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87hbb192kb.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46648 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0Ncs-0005BI-21 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:33:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Ncq-00039Z-Od for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:33:09 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:45528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Ncq-00039E-ML for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:33:08 -0400 Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so1683192yib.0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:33:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I wish org-mode can do like this... - Row 1 :exports tabel - 1.1 - 1.2 - 1.3 - Row 2 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 2.3 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Ben wrote: >> >> Out of boredom, I've written a draft for it. >> > > > Woohoo! congrats for the way you're getting bored! > Hey thank you Nicolas! > >> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp > > So here I'm guessing the whole code fits into Babel, right? >> >> All of this will convert > > (...) >> >> | Row 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | >> | Row 2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | >> > > Oh actually you went the 'line' way -- and not the column. > Considering, I actually think you're right. > I got used to the ReST way (1 item + sub-items =3D 1 column) but I think = your > way seems more natural. > Cool, thank you again! > >> >> and the other way. >> > > I'm afraid I don't get the 'and the other way', does it means your code c= an > go the column way as well?! > Splendid thanks again Nicolas! > =C2=A0=C2=A0-- Ben >