2010/9/29 Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>

> Hi Rainer,
>
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
> > Based on a discussion in the thread "Problem with PROPERTIES :OPTIONS:
> when
> > exporting subtree", The idea came ub by Mathew Lundin to be able to "send
> > the results or a source code block (either executed code or exported org
> > snippets) via babel to a target in an external file.".
> >
> > The scenario or context in which the idea came up:
> >
> > I am using org babel for literate programming and I document my
> parameters
> > for simulations in a table in org. Now when writing a paper, for which I
> use
> > a different program (I use LyX), but I still would like to include the
> > tables from my original org file in them. Therefore I was looking for a
> > possibility to export ONLY the table into a .tex file, so that it can be
> > included in the LyX / LaTeX via \input{theTable.tex} . Therefore I would
> > need an export of the table in LaTeX format, but no preamble or anything.
>
> *Side question*, because this is quite important, I think: why are you
> still
> using LyX directly?
>

Because it is easier for me? Don't get me wrong - I really like org mode and
org babel - I can not imagine working without them (wait - I did that until
about a year ago...). But for writing papers for publication, other tools
are more suitable FOR ME: These papers do not include any literate
programming and no to be executed code, and I really like the interface of
LyX for writing. More even then a text editor for LaTeX (however advanced or
not it may be), it does what it is supposed to be doing: to let me
concentrate on the contents of the paper. But as I said, that is my personal
opinion, and others might prefer other approaches.


>
> For my literate programming needs, I've been able to completely forget
> about
> my past ways to do:
>
> - Nuweb (in MS Windows) extensions to LaTeX
> - Noweb (in Linux) extensions to LaTeX
>
> and switch, with much more benefits, to Org-only files.


Yes - concerning programming, literate programming, documenting the source
code, etc., org mode with org-babel is PERFECT.


> What is stopping you from being able to do so?


As I said - org is getting close to being a swiss army knife, but I tried to
open a bottle with it and my screen broke - so I still use a bottle opener
for that...


> That root cause should be fixed, IMHO -- if doable, of course...
>
>
> > As far as I was told, this possibility does not exist in org.
>
> If I understand correctly, this is, indeed, the difficulty Eric exposed us,
> when I was working on the isodoc letter (trying to convert Org blocks to
> LaTeX, and get everything assembled upon exporting).
>

Effectively, yes - except that the org block converted to LaTeX should be
available in files, which can be used from other programs as well.

Cheers,

Rainer


> Best regards,
>  Seb
>
> --
> Sébastien Vauban
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>



-- 
NEW GERMAN FAX NUMBER!!!

Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Natural Sciences Building
Office Suite 2039
Stellenbosch University
Main Campus, Merriman Avenue
Stellenbosch
South Africa

Cell:           +27 - (0)83 9479 042
Fax:            +27 - (0)86 516 2782
Fax:            +49 - (0)321 2125 2244
email:          Rainer@krugs.de

Skype:          RMkrug
Google:         R.M.Krug@gmail.com