From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathaniel Flath Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Alphabetical ordered lists Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:13:55 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bp8o498o.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <393C5110-E4D3-4B36-8F4E-4F94B5AA0F93@gmail.com> <87k4m876g3.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87iq1r7k00.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <747F5104-6B1C-43E8-BF42-883287B7E303@gmail.com> <87aan0789y.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33313 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1UNt-0004vJ-Ci for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:26:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1UCC-0003r2-Tk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:13:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:55676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1UCC-0003qk-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:13:56 -0400 Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so775492qwb.0 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87aan0789y.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bernt Hansen , Jacob Mitchell , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Carsten, If you think this is acceptable I'll start working on it. Thanks, Nathaniel Flath On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > >>>>>> Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Or, alternatively, put it in with an option to turn it on (default >> off, I think). And maybe we should after all limit it to a single >> character to avoid confusion. Yes, I do realise that I asked for >> several characters - but I am learning... > > What will then happen if the user is cycling bullets in a 100+ items > list and hits alphabetic bullets? Besides undoing that move, there's > nothing much that could be done then. Further cycling would become > impossible. > > One idea would be to count items before cycling, and skipping > alphabetic bullets for lists above 26 items. It has to be carefully > implemented, as it could get very heavy on computations with large > lists. > > Also, inserting new items in an alphabetical list should check if the > 27th item has been reached and change bullets back to numbers if > needed. > > I'm sure there are others subtleties that I can't think of right now. > > Regards, > > -- Nicolas >