From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Puneeth Chaganti Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Timestamps surrounded by @@ in HTML export Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:14:25 +0530 Message-ID: References: <8762t3oje2.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbcnlmys.fsf@gnu.org> <8739o6eph9.fsf@gnu.org> <87tygmd9u7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37902 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkgl6-000107-Js for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:44:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkgl4-0001N8-Cu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:44:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:56652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkgl4-0001Mu-5v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:44:46 -0500 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so222888wyj.0 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:44:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tygmd9u7.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Jason Dunsmore , Org-mode mailing list On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Bastien wrote= : > Puneeth Chaganti writes: > >>>> I don't really understand what is going on here, but there was one @ >>>> still appearing after this patch was applied. I am sending a patch to >>>> remove the one remaining @ symbol in the `org-html-handle-time-stamps` >>>> function. I don't know if this breaks something else and why this was >>>> left out by Jason. >>> >>> Better to test your own patch then ;) =C2=A0I did so, looks fine, I app= lied >>> it. =C2=A0Thanks! >> >> :) I did test my patch and it worked. > > Ah okay, sorry for assuming otherwise! > >> But these @ seemed to have been put there for some reason, I wasn't >> able to understand, in the quick look that I had. Anyway, thanks. > > It took me a while to understand this as well: when looking at > org-export-as-html, you see some occurrences of "@". =C2=A0These > org-specific @tags are escaped and will be taken care of in the > rest of the function. > > But org-html-handle-time-stamps happens after these @tags have > been taken care of, which means that no @ is necessary in this > function. > > Hope this helps :) Thanks for explaining this. :) --=20 Puneeth