From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Horn Subject: Re: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:31:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> <87ei8sae89.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkrg600j.fsf@gmail.com> <87ei8s1qta.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37198 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaBg2-0004Vf-Oy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:32:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaBfJ-0003Qe-1U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:31:26 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:53888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaBfI-0003QL-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:31:24 -0500 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so7762632fxm.0 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:31:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ei8s1qta.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org-mode ml , =?UTF-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bastien wrote= : > Hi =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n, > > =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec writes: > >> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects >> of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable >> (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike >> [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: >> header space. > > Not that reducing the label from [Orgmode] to [Org] already seem to be a > progress in the right direction :) > > Would you object having [Org] instead of [Orgmode]? > >> I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that. > > As Giovanni recalled, this is a standard GNU practice and I won't break > it. =C2=A0Maybe this is a leftover from the time when most used email cli= ents > had no clever filters -- but maybe it's still useful for web archiving > or other purposes I cannot think of right now. > Is the capital-O gnu practice as well? I have no objection to changing the tag, since gmail filters my mail for me, but a lower-case-o seems more consistent with other org nomenclature. --=20 Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/