From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Puneeth Chaganti Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Timestamps surrounded by @@ in HTML export Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:25:05 +0530 Message-ID: References: <8762t3oje2.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbcnlmys.fsf@gnu.org> <8739o6eph9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35108 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkdsq-0001z3-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:40:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkZRD-0004x5-Jr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:55:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:39376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkZRD-0004vn-EH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:55:47 -0500 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so8186030wyj.0 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:55:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8739o6eph9.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Jason Dunsmore , Org-mode mailing list On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Bastien wrote= : > Hi Puneeth, > > Puneeth Chaganti writes: > >> I don't really understand what is going on here, but there was one @ >> still appearing after this patch was applied. I am sending a patch to >> remove the one remaining @ symbol in the `org-html-handle-time-stamps` >> function. I don't know if this breaks something else and why this was >> left out by Jason. > > Better to test your own patch then ;) =C2=A0I did so, looks fine, I appli= ed > it. =C2=A0Thanks! :) I did test my patch and it worked. But these @ seemed to have been put there for some reason, I wasn't able to understand, in the quick look that I had. Anyway, thanks. -- Puneeth