From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Neff Subject: Pretty-up Log Entries Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:28:25 -0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48698 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGL1i-0003Yf-Tp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:28:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGL1e-00042J-Tc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:28:30 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:61905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGL1e-00042E-P6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:28:26 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so1429789bwz.0 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:28:25 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode If I recall correctly, the log entries shown in the agenda are pretty much hard-coded and difficult to change. I recall fairly easy ways of sending data from emacs to external files, and then formatting that data with script(s) or some external program, then reading them back into emacs. Would org-babel be a good thing to use to grab the log book from the agenda, then massage the data in an external script, and then bring the data back into Emacs? Specifically, I'm looking to simplify the log entry report. Here's an example of what I'd like to see: 9:05 Did something 10 minutes 9:15 Something else 20 minutes -- 40 minutes unaccounted for -- 10:30 Something else 2 minutes 10:30 Another task 10 minutes <-- overlapping items, needs fixing Total: 1:00 Any suggestions for accomplishing this? I'd like to be able to snap-look at the stuff I've done today and be able to tidy up the time and find holes to account for. Thanks, --Nate