From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: [OT] recutils Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:59:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874oauh7zq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd39yb60.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53534 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPJoW-0002Ig-Jr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:00:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPJoV-000442-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:00:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87vd39yb60.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Jose E. Marchesi" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Jose On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 13:28, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > But note that the "relational" characteristics in > recutils are not very sophisticated. > > The rule here is: if you need something more complex then you probably > should be using a real relational dbms instead :) Ok, maybe I expected a bit too much for the initial version 1.0. But is it already possible or planned to allow recsel deliver field values from two tables, joined together with a foreign key or what does the manual mean with "the ability of records to refer to other records (sort of foreign keys)"? Michael