From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Puneeth <punchagan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug: org-narrow-to-subtree
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:58:22 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZ2O39iL7bWZ3Tw3_LPz+Qhpt-CH61UX_x3875@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=TYXMKAPoNs5_j24VSW0xoQwQQ+0kJbOxGvQWJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<0FCA5AA0-FAF6-4129-80B3-8E2B3BF85580@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36059 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PD7YC-0001jr-Tl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:28:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <punchagan@gmail.com>) id 1PD7YB-0005KT-ST
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:28:44 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:44064)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <punchagan@gmail.com>) id 1PD7YB-0005KL-Lp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:28:43 -0400
Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so654798wwi.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0FCA5AA0-FAF6-4129-80B3-8E2B3BF85580@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Carsten,

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Carsten Dominik
<carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Puneeth,
>
> I am unable to reproduce this problem....

Is it because David has already fixed the problem? :)

Thanks,
Puneeth