On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Alan L Tyree wrote:
>
> > The development list wouldn't be very interesting without the intense
> > interaction that it now has with users. The org list seems unique in
> > this, at least for the lists that I have sometimes monitored.
>
> No, really, it's not that unique. And many project still works correctly
> with several mailing list.
>

I know that most projects work this way, and I am sure that Org would
survive and prosper no matter what the decision is here. I still say, of the
lists that I have monitored (not many - I am a retired Law Professor with
only a slight knowledge of software development) the Org list is the most
interesting.

It's just a personal preference - I don't see any decisive argument for any
of the possible decisions on splitting the list.

Whatever happens, many thanks to all the Org developers for some great
software.

Cheers,
Alan


>
> --
> Julien Danjou
> ❱ http://julien.danjou.info
>



-- 
Alan L Tyree                    http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206