From: John Tait <johngtait@gmail.com>
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:27:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikPBFShAaY3LwyxandoYZpLBB8vJ=RDXk6HgMRL@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81zkoklpk8.fsf@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1923 bytes --]
Thanks Jambunathan K. Your concise summary is correct.
As it stands, selective export from Orgmode is already excellent --
combining both #+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: and #+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: in various
ways allows for very precise exporting; this is particularly apparent when
dealing with tags at different heading levels.
I am particularly thinking about largish publishing projects, where it would
be less easy to add manage individual tags at the level of the heading.
Building groups of composite tags from small groups of atomic tags, as
needed, and then exporting/excluding those composite tags (plus other atomic
tags) would be a neat way of managing this. The atomic tags could remain
fairly static and the composite tags could be juggled as needed.
Migrating stuff to Orgmode isn't a big deal -- the interesting part is using
the information once it's there.
As I hope is clear, I think Org is fantastic as it stands. For the type of
thing I am (already) doing, the only other real solutions are DITA-based --
and Org is a whole lot more fun.
John
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> IIUC, what you are saying is that you would like to define few atomic
> tags and a few composite tag. A composite tag is presumably a union of
> some of those atomic tags. You need an ability to selectively export of
> the items that fall under the composite tag.
>
> Orgmode allows selective viewing (and exporting) of tagged documents. I
> think all you need is to define a query and export only the visible
> portion of the document. (I don't use tagging much but you can get
> useful information from the manual)
>
> It still it beats me how would you solve the problem of migrating
> existing word documents in to Orgmode. Looks like that is a much bigger
> problem right there than the lack of facility for elaborate hierarchical
> organization.
>
> Jambunathan K.
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2377 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 23:09 "Tag hierarchy" idea John Tait
2011-03-22 0:57 ` Matt Lundin
[not found] ` <AANLkTikwOWJdqKrZDE+JUzezEpvfNQ537xRgtzYgssAd@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-22 14:17 ` Matt Lundin
2011-03-22 4:08 ` Jambunathan K
2011-03-22 8:27 ` Christian Moe
2011-03-22 13:57 ` John Tait
2011-03-24 11:34 ` Jambunathan K
2011-03-24 22:27 ` John Tait [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTikPBFShAaY3LwyxandoYZpLBB8vJ=RDXk6HgMRL@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=johngtait@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=kjambunathan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).