From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Filippo A. Salustri" <salustri@ryerson.ca> Subject: Re: advice re organizing todo agenda items Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:32 -0400 Message-ID: <AANLkTik9aedKbJ3QOGR7-jC9fA94XQ1Rh0Pg2jn3zi-X@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTikcqGjoXMCqWp7H=uWXrHW7Sw=NFeKp7qK91GRa@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikV8AN+i+-YZGYc4AJB=L5v90YWYa=yRvBwsaFU@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5Eqp-0004Rg-18 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <fil.salustri@gmail.com>) id 1Q5Eqj-0001N3-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:38733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <fil.salustri@gmail.com>) id 1Q5Eqj-0001Ml-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:33 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2215617wyf.0 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:11:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikV8AN+i+-YZGYc4AJB=L5v90YWYa=yRvBwsaFU@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel & Nick, I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em. I would prefer finer control over them if I were to continue using priorities in this way. Q: My reading of the doc is that there's no way to change the number of priorities org supports: we're "stuck" with A/B/C. Right? Tags may work, but will require more updating than I would prefer. I come from the world of iPhone apps, and it's quite popular to have apps that let you cycle through a list of items - essentially a circular list. It's also a foundation of Forster's Autofocus task management methods. I'll take all this under advisement and see what I can think of. Thanks! Cheers. Fil On 30 March 2011 23:34, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, use tags, then use a custom sort. =A0Or, if you do not use > priorities for local sorting, use priorities. > --=20 Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Ryerson University 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749 Fax: 416/979-5265 Email: salustri@ryerson.ca http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/