From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Filippo A. Salustri" <salustri@ryerson.ca>
Subject: Re: advice re organizing todo agenda items
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:32 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik9aedKbJ3QOGR7-jC9fA94XQ1Rh0Pg2jn3zi-X@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikcqGjoXMCqWp7H=uWXrHW7Sw=NFeKp7qK91GRa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikV8AN+i+-YZGYc4AJB=L5v90YWYa=yRvBwsaFU@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37391 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5Eqp-0004Rg-18
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fil.salustri@gmail.com>) id 1Q5Eqj-0001N3-Ff
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:38 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:38733)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fil.salustri@gmail.com>) id 1Q5Eqj-0001Ml-AV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:11:33 -0400
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2215617wyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikV8AN+i+-YZGYc4AJB=L5v90YWYa=yRvBwsaFU@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Samuel & Nick,

I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em.  I would prefer
finer control over them if I were to continue using priorities in this
way.

Q: My reading of the doc is that there's no way to change the number
of priorities org supports: we're "stuck" with A/B/C.  Right?

Tags may work, but will require more updating than I would prefer.
I come from the world of iPhone apps, and it's quite popular to have
apps that let you cycle through a list of items - essentially a
circular list.
It's also a foundation of Forster's Autofocus task management methods.

I'll take all this under advisement and see what I can think of.

Thanks!
Cheers.
Fil

On 30 March 2011 23:34, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, use tags, then use a custom sort. =A0Or, if you do not use
> priorities for local sorting, use priorities.
>



--=20
Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng.
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Ryerson University
350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON
M5B 2K3, Canada
Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749
Fax: 416/979-5265
Email: salustri@ryerson.ca
http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/