From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Gnuplot best practice? Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:11:10 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1544594900==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51283 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OhW4J-0001a3-Ox for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:11:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhW4H-0002Zr-7K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:11:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:59830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhW4H-0002Zd-55 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:11:13 -0400 Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so6282452qwk.0 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:11:12 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode --===============1544594900== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e8874535371ca048d2fc83a --e0cb4e8874535371ca048d2fc83a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I've been hunting for some info on gnuplot and wondered if there is a suggested "best practice" for using it and org... I've just used what worg has (#+PLOT: ...) - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-plot.php But several discussions seem to show a lot of people using embedded source instead (#+begin_src gnuplot...)? - http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg26014.html - http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg27861.html - http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg28119.html Is it better to choose one over the other? I'm guessing it's easier to find help with the babel method since the lingo is the same vs. needing to know the discrepancies used by org-plot to translate into gnuplot? Thanks for suggestions, John --e0cb4e8874535371ca048d2fc83a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,


I've been hunting for some info o= n gnuplot and wondered if there is a suggested "best practice" fo= r using it and org...

I've just used what worg= has (#+PLOT: ...)


But several discussions seem to show a lot of people using embedded so= urce instead (#+begin_src gnuplot...)?

Is it better to choose one over the other? I'm gues= sing it's easier to find help with the babel method since the lingo is = the same vs. needing to know the discrepancies used by org-plot to translat= e into gnuplot?


Thanks for suggestions,
John= --e0cb4e8874535371ca048d2fc83a-- --===============1544594900== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1544594900==--