Hi,<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve been hunting for some info on gnuplot and wondered if there is a suggested &quot;best practice&quot; for using it and org...</div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve just used what worg has (#+PLOT: ...)</div>
<div>- <a href="http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-plot.php">http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-plot.php</a></div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div>But several discussions seem to show a lot of people using embedded source instead (#+begin_src gnuplot...)?</div><div>- <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg26014.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg26014.html</a></div>
<div>- <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg27861.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg27861.html</a></div><div>- <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg28119.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg28119.html</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Is it better to choose one over the other? I&#39;m guessing it&#39;s easier to find help with the babel method since the lingo is the same vs. needing to know the discrepancies used by org-plot to translate into gnuplot?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for suggestions,</div><div>John</div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">