Thanks Nick. - Whoops on forgetting the = in my first example! - Is this hard to integrate? Is it possible to pass this option to LaTeX just as with figures? It only involves overriding [htb] with [H]... John On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > John Hendy wrote: > > > > > I had a problem with floating tables/figures a ways back, found here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg25566.html > > > > The solution, which was simply inserting #+ATTR_LATEX: placement=[H], > worked perfectly. > > > > I just ran into it again, however. my org file has the following order in > a section: > > > > * section > > text before table 1 > > table 1 (featuring both #+CAPTION and #+ATTR_LATEX: placement [H]) > > text before table 2 > > table 2 (featuring both #+CAPTION and #+ATTR_LATEX: placement [H]) > > > > [Just a note for the unwary: the syntax above is not quite correct - > John gives the correct syntax below in his example.] > > > But it's being exported to pdf like so: > > > > text before table 1 > > text before table 2 > > table 1 > > table 2 > > > > The exported .tex has this for table 1: > > \begin{table}[htb] > > \caption{table 1 caption} > > \begin{center} > > > > If I manually change the \begin{table}[htb] line to \begin{table}[H], > things work exactly as I want. Somehow the [H] option just isn't making it > > through... > > > > Just to be sure I created an blank org file with only this: > > > > * test > > > > #+CAPTION: test table > > #+ATTR_LaTeX: placement=[H] > > | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | > > |------+------+------+------| > > | test | test | test | test | > > | test | test | test | test | > > > > It gets exported to this: > > > > \begin{table}[htb] > > \caption{test table} > > \begin{center} > > \begin{tabular}{llll} > > > > Did something change between 6.35 and 7.01 or in the LaTeX table options? > > > > I think that placement works fine for figures, but not for tables. In > fact, I cannot find the code that's supposed to do this for tables: I > suspect that it never existed. So unless I'm mistaken, it seems that > tables never got the placement treatment that figures did. > > Nick >