From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: tag or property names with dashes Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:02:49 +0530 Message-ID: References: <4C63A6F1-5F71-4569-A1C5-C2C137DDF65B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36080 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmVSq-0003XR-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:33:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmVSo-0006rC-G6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:33:11 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:48071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmVSo-0006r2-9s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:33:10 -0400 Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so3002832bwz.0 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C63A6F1-5F71-4569-A1C5-C2C137DDF65B@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Ilya Shlyakhter , emacs-orgmode On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Manish wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 17, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Ilya Shlyakhter wrote: >>> >>>> When doing an agenda tags match for tags or properties with dashes in >>>> their name, >>>> the dashes become negation operators: "my-prop>0" means "entries that >>>> have the tag >>>> 'my' and do not have a positive property 'prop'", rather than "entries >>>> that have a positive >>>> property 'my-prop'". Is there a way to escape the dashes to get the >>>> latter meaning? >>> >>> Dashes are not valid in TODO keywords and tags, but you are right, >>> properties do allow them. hmmm. I don't remember why I did allow hem >>> - but surely enough I did. >>> >> >> Are "#" and "%" are disallowed in the tags? Can they be made to work please? > > This is non-trivial and I shy away from the work for now. > Make me a patch and I will look at it. Attempting something that /you/ call non-trivial is nigh impossible for me. :( But even if I were to dare.. any hints where I could start? Thanks -- Manish