From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Horn Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:22:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <871v48s3xu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> <15074.1295540204@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <871v47xvjo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50698 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pg0GE-0004SV-TH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:33:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pg0GD-0000uB-NQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:33:34 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:62591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pg0GD-0000u3-Bi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:33:33 -0500 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so984876fxm.0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:33:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871v47xvjo.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Bastien , Matt Lundin , Jason Dunsmore , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Eric Schulte wrot= e: > Jeff Horn writes: > >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Nick Dokos wro= te: >>> Matt Lundin wrote: >>> >>>> Nick Dokos writes: >>>> >>>> > Matt Lundin wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> So the new, "flat" FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are >>>> >> welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unread= able - >>>> > at least to my eyes. >>>> >>>> I agree. I reverted the black background. >>>> >>>> If a dark background is preferred, we'll need to make sure that we >>>> export an entire dark color theme (such as zenburn) with >>>> org-export-htmlize-generate-css. >>>> >>>> As it stood, we were simply using a black background with colors >>>> exported from a light theme (e.g, dark blue headlines). Needless to sa= y, >>>> this made the text unreadable. :) >>>> >>> >>> Much better! >> >> Nick, >> >> This is what I see when I visit the FAQ page.[1] The TOC column seems >> to be very narrow. I'm using Chrome with the "Next Worg" stylesheet. >> > > I believe the "Next Worg" stylesheet is very old and not a product of > the current round of CSS updates. =A0Once the arternative stylesheets are > updated to reflect this most recent development round I would imagine > that the "Next Worg" stylesheet will disappear. > In that case, it looks great! --=20 Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/