From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Org-mode version 6.30; Links in categories break layout Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:19:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1251913586.22623.1332894407@webmail.messagingengine.com><6FD26E66-BBA4-4AD8-9329-70E3024E79FC@gmail.com><1251976346.8320.1333017467@webmail.messagingengine.com><1251984567.29809.1333027499@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1251995036.29639.1333070001@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjT5F-0000P9-MO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:19:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjT5B-0000JY-0z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:19:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51540 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MjT5A-0000JM-Tx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:19:40 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:23073) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjT5A-0007nk-J7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:19:40 -0400 Received: from postduif.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.180]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjT59-00086I-Ii for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:19:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1251995036.29639.1333070001@webmail.messagingengine.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Peter Westlake Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" On Sep 3, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Peter Westlake wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:56 +0200, "Carsten Dominik" > wrote: >> >> On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Peter Westlake wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:12 +0200, "Carsten Dominik" >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Peter Westlake wrote: > ... >>> You said that links aren't supported in categories, but for a >>> feature >>> that isn't supported, they work very well! In what sense are they >>> not >>> supported? >> >> They are not supported in the sense that I never have tried to make >> them work as links. It is pure "accident" that they are activated >> as links, because there is a function running through to activate >> links that are in headlines, and by accident the regexp search >> matches in the prefix as well. >> >> They are not supported in the way that I guarantee them to continue >> to >> work in future versions. >> >> Unless this thread convinces me otherwise, of course. I can now >> see that they can be useful as a connection to an anchestor of the >> entry.... > > Well, I would be in favour of that - as you may have guessed! > It's very convenient to have the link always be there without > having to put it into every entry. OK then. [1] The prefix is now formatted properly, and C-c C-o gives also access to this link. - Carsten [1] I watched Raising Arizona yesterday night..... > > Peter. > > P.S. Apologies if you get two copies of this - X crashed while I was > sending it.